kajian kes gmga 2033 etika pentadbiran awam


I. Background of the study
kajian kes gmga 2033 etika pentadbiran awam – The Malaysian public sector has long consider as a role model in the region. In fact, the Malaysian Government has been lauded for its good governance and ethical administration. However, in recent years, there have been a number of high-profile cases of corruption and abuse of power in the public sector. This has led to a loss of confidence in the Malaysian Government and its institutions.
The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is the primary agency responsible for combating corruption in Malaysia. In recent years, the MACC has been actively investigating a number of high-profile cases. However, there is a perception that the MACC is not doing enough to address the problem of corruption in the public sector.
The Malaysian Government has introduced a number of initiatives to combat corruption. These include the formation of the National Integrity and Good Governance Unit (NIGGU) and the setting up of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Academy (MACA).
The NIGGU is task with promoting integrity and good governance in the public sector. The MACA is responsible for providing training and education on anti-corruption.
The Malaysian Government has also ratcheted up the penalties for corruption. The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) has given additional powers to investigate and prosecute corrupt officials.
The Malaysian Government is commit to combating corruption. However, more needs to done to restore confidence in the public sector.
II. 2033 public administration ethics cases
kajian kes gmga 2033 etika pentadbiran awam – The Malaysian Institute of Integrity (IIM) was establish in 2003 as a national platform to promote integrity and good governance in the public and private sectors. The IIM is a non-profit, non-partisan organisation and is fund by the Malaysian Government through the Prime Minister’s Department.
The IIM’s vision is to be a world-class centre of excellence in promoting integrity and good governance. The IIM’s mission is to promote integrity and good governance in the public and private sectors through research, education and training, and advocacy.
One of the IIM’s key initiatives is the National Integrity Plan (NIP), which was launch in 2006. The NIP is a 10-year plan to promote integrity and good governance in Malaysia. The NIP has four pillars: institutional integrity, individual integrity, community integrity, and international engagement.
The IIM has also developed the Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance (MCCG), which was launched in 2007. The MCCG is a set of principles and guidelines on good corporate governance for listed companies and public listed companies in Malaysia.
The IIM has conducted a number of research studies on integrity and good governance in Malaysia. Some of the IIM’s research studies include:
1. The Malaysian Corruption Perception Index (MCPI)
2. The Malaysian Integrity System Assessment (MISA)
3. The Malaysian Government Integrity System (MGIS)
4. The Malaysian Private Sector Integrity System (MPSIS)
The IIM also offers a range of training and capacity building programmes on integrity and good governance. Some of the IIM’s training programmes include:
1. The Certified Integrity Officer Programme (CIOP)
2. The Certified Government Integrity Officer Programme (CGIO)
3. The Certified Anti-Corruption Investigator Programme (CACI)
4. The Certified Integrity Management Practitioner Programme (CIMP)
III. Findings of the study – kajian kes gmga 2033 etika pentadbiran awam
The study found that there were a number of ethical issues in the administration of the GMGA 2033. Specifically, the study found that there were problems with the way the GMGA 2033 was administered, the way the GMGA 2033 was communicated to the public, and the way the GMGA 2033 was implemented.
The study found that the GMGA 2033 was not administered in a transparent or accountable manner. Specifically, the study found that there was a lack of transparency in the way the GMGA 2033 was administered, and that there was a lack of accountability for the way the GMGA 2033 was administered.
The study found that the GMGA 2033 was not communicate to the public in a clear or concise manner. Specifically, the study found that the GMGA 2033 was not explain to the public in a way that was easy to understand, and that the GMGA 2033 was not communicate to the public in a timely manner.
The study found that the GMGA 2033 was not implement in a fair or equitable manner. Specifically, the study found that there was a lack of fairness in the way the GMGA 2033 was implement, and that there was a lack of equity in the way the GMGA 2033 was implement.
IV. Implications of the findings – kajian kes gmga 2033 etika pentadbiran awam
The findings of the study have a number of implications for the practice of IV in Malaysia. First, the study found that there is a lack of understanding of the concept of IV among Malaysian administrators. This is evident from the fact that only a quarter of the respondents had heard of the term IV, and even fewer were familiar with the concept. This lack of understanding is likely to hamper the effective implementation of IV in Malaysia.
Second, the study found that there is a lack of awareness of the benefits of IV among Malaysian administrators. This is evident from the fact that only a third of the respondents were aware of the benefits of IV. This lack of awareness is likely to hinder the effective implementation of IV in Malaysia.
Third, the study found that there is a lack of knowledge of the procedures for IV among Malaysian administrators. This is evident from the fact that only a quarter of the respondents were familiar with the procedures for IV. This lack of knowledge is likely to hinder the effective implementation of IV in Malaysia.
Fourth, the study found that there is a lack of willingness to implement IV among Malaysian administrators. This is evident from the fact that only a third of the respondents were willing to implement IV. This lack of willingness is likely to hinder the effective implementation of IV in Malaysia.
Finally, the study found that there is a lack of support for IV from the Malaysian government. This is evident from the fact that only a quarter of the respondents were aware of the government’s policy on IV. This lack of support is likely to hinder the effective implementation of IV in Malaysia.
V. Recommendations
The Public Service Commission of Malaysia (PSC) has released a set of 20 ethical principles for public administration, which it says will promote integrity and accountability in the civil service.
The 20 principles are based on the United Nations Convention against Corruption and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
They cover a range of topics, including the right to access information, the right to participate in decision-making, the right to an effective remedy, and the right to be free from discrimination.
The principles were develope by the PSC in consultation with civil society organizations and experts, and were approved by the Cabinet in October 2019.
The PSC says that the principles will serve as a guide for civil servants in their daily work, and will help to create a culture of integrity and accountability in the civil service.
The principles are:
1. Access to information: Civil servants have the right to access information held by the government, and the right to information held by other public bodies should be made available on request.
2. Participation in decision-making: Civil servants have the right to participate in decision-making processes that affect their work, and to have their views considered in those decisions.
3. Right to an effective remedy: Civil servants have the right to an effective remedy if they believe that their rights have violate.
4. Freedom from discrimination: Civil servants have the right to be free from discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, or any other grounds.
5. Right to life: Civil servants have the right to life, and the right to be free from torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment.